Tags: Africa, Australia, Clarke, David, Europe, India, South, States, USA, United, More…international, overseas, world
Permalink Reply by Robin Thompson on August 19, 2009 at 15:19
Permalink Reply by Mike Knowles on August 20, 2009 at 10:12
Permalink Reply by Geoff Gibas on August 21, 2009 at 11:16 Congratulations David
This is a great step forward for the Society
Here in India the original goals of the RSA are very much to the fore. Elevation of the working man within society by means of accreditation, design education, finding solutions to long term but necessary evils ( I.E. rag pickers ) - the list is endless
The Delhi chapter was set up 4 years ago and we now have circa 100 Fellows. We are moving forward and achieving many of our objectives but I am sure we would achieve many more with the help of the greater Fellowship
We will suggest to London an Indian page on the website. It would feel more like we accepted the notion that we are RSA Fellows in India rather than Indian Fellows - if you get my point, part of the whole picture. As Fellows our goals and aspirations will be similar. We stand more chance of making change collectively than otherwise.
May I conclude by inviting all and any Fellows visiting India or who may need some advice on particular issues to feel free to contact us
Kind regards
Mike Knowles
Head of Fellowship
RSA in India
Permalink Reply by Mike Knowles on August 25, 2009 at 8:16
Permalink Reply by Michaela Crimmin on August 26, 2009 at 16:29
Permalink Reply by Belinda Lester on August 26, 2009 at 17:50
Permalink Reply by Professor Arthur Mark on August 29, 2009 at 23:01 David: Congratulations on your election.
I am in 2 minds about whether RSA should have one network for all or should have a hierarchy of networks.
My current view is we should have both.
Some issues are UK specific and RSA remains very UK-centric. In some cases this makes good sense, for example having a heated discussion about the Gurkas being denied UK citizenship.
About 80 years ago when much of the world map was shaded pink, many Brits in the professions were widely traveled and knew about places such as India, Italy and the colonies. Today Brits such as myself have emigrated and have a fond but more detached view of the UK. We will stand up and be counted for example when US politicians talk nonsense about the UK national health system; or we will provide a different perspective on charter schooling. However we are less interested in the curriculum for s specific school in Edinburgh.
My conclusion to be challenged please is that RSA needs to provide for both global and local conversations. However, the way this is current achieved is to list all local groups together regardless of their scale. USA with a population of 300 million is shown alongside Wales with 3 million. Most large organizations have some form of regional grouping....the Americas, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and so on. I would ask that consideration be given to this approach.
What does anyone else think?
Permalink Reply by Professor Arthur Mark on August 29, 2009 at 23:04 David: Congratulations on your election.
I am in 2 minds about whether RSA should have one network for all or should have a hierarchy of networks.
My current view is we should have both.
Some issues are UK specific and RSA remains very UK-centric. In some cases this makes good sense, for example having a heated discussion about the Gurkas being denied UK citizenship.
About 80 years ago when much of the world map was shaded pink, many Brits in the professions were widely traveled and knew about places such as India, Italy and the colonies. Today Brits such as myself have emigrated and have a fond but more detached view of the UK. We will stand up and be counted for example when US politicians talk nonsense about the UK national health system; or we will provide a different perspective on charter schooling. However we are less interested in the curriculum for s specific school in Edinburgh.
My conclusion to be challenged please is that RSA needs to provide for both global and local conversations. However, the way this is current achieved is to list all local groups together regardless of their scale. USA with a population of 300 million is shown alongside Wales with 3 million. Most large organizations have some form of regional grouping....the Americas, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and so on. I would ask that consideration be given to this approach.
What does anyone else think?
Permalink Reply by Professor Arthur Mark on August 29, 2009 at 23:13
Permalink Reply by Paul Vittles on September 7, 2009 at 10:09
Permalink Reply by Jonathan Jewell on January 28, 2010 at 9:48 Over the next few months the RSAde Group will be consolidating regional social networks and nings.
The aim will be to improve connectivity for Fellows, improve communication and reduce fragmentation.
If you would like further information on these changes please contact the RSAde team via the Digital Engagement group on this network.
Created by Matthew Kálmán Mezey Dec 6, 2011 at 11:03am. Last updated by Matthew Kálmán Mezey Jun 22, 2012.
Created by Gurmeet Singh Feb 24, 2012 at 2:07pm. Last updated by Gurmeet Singh Feb 24, 2012.
Created by Matthew Kálmán Mezey Nov 19, 2011 at 9:23pm. Last updated by Matthew Kálmán Mezey Dec 6, 2011.
© 2013 Created by RSA Networks.