What do candidates think of the progress made by the RSA Fellowship Council in its 3 years since inception? There is no doubt that communications between staff and Fellows have improved since the Fellowship Council has been established, and that the potential for collaboration is far greater than it was in 2009. The successes have been outlined in detail by FC chair, Bob Porrer. However, the apparent reluctance among many Fellows to engage with the current elections implies that there are plenty who see the FC as irrelevant: little more than a talking shop or "layer of fudge". So, it would be great to know from the candidates here: what role do you see the Fellowship Council playing over the next two years?
Tags: Council, Fellowship, RSA, RSAelections, elections
Permalink Reply by Pam Warhurst on July 9, 2012 at 7:44
Permalink Reply by Steve Coles on July 12, 2012 at 8:52 Many thanks for your post Pam. I'm certainly keep to see the Catalyst fund flourish, have greater impact and do better at measuring and communicating that impact. I'm also in agreement about better regional showcasing of what the RSA and Fellows are doing. The 'junior RSA programme' idea is one that I know I'm now going to be turning over in my mind for some time to come - great idea.
Over the next few months the RSAde Group will be consolidating regional social networks and nings.
The aim will be to improve connectivity for Fellows, improve communication and reduce fragmentation.
If you would like further information on these changes please contact the RSAde team via the Digital Engagement group on this network.
Created by Matthew Kálmán Mezey Dec 6, 2011 at 11:03am. Last updated by Matthew Kálmán Mezey Jun 22, 2012.
Created by Gurmeet Singh Feb 24, 2012 at 2:07pm. Last updated by Gurmeet Singh Feb 24, 2012.
Created by Matthew Kálmán Mezey Nov 19, 2011 at 9:23pm. Last updated by Matthew Kálmán Mezey Dec 6, 2011.
© 2013 Created by RSA Networks.